Palliative care is effective: but hospital symptom outcomes superior

Author:

Eagar Kathy,Clapham Sabina Petranella,Allingham Samuel Frederic

Abstract

ObjectivesTo explore differences in severe symptom outcomes for palliative care patients receiving hospital care compared with those receiving care at home.MethodsChange in symptom distress from the start of an episode of palliative care to just prior to death was measured for 25 679 patients who died under the care of a hospital or home-based palliative care team between January 2015 and December 2016. Logistic regression models controlled for differences between hospital and home and enabled a comparison of the number of severe symptoms just prior to death.ResultsAll symptoms improved and over 85% of all patients had no severe symptoms prior to death. Pain control illustrates this with 7.4% of patients reporting severe pain distress at episode start and 2.5% just prior to death. When comparing all symptom outcomes by place of death, hospital patients are 3.7 times more likely than home patients to have no severe symptoms.Conclusion Symptom outcomes are better for hospital patients. Patients at home have less improvement overall and some symptoms get worse. Reasons for the difference in outcomes by hospital and home are multifactorial and must be considered in relation to the patient’s right to choose their place of care.

Funder

Department of Health, Australian Government

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical,Oncology(nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference14 articles.

1. Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC). http://www.pcoc.org.au (accessed Feb 2018).

2. Improving national hospice/palliative care service symptom outcomes systematically through point-of-care data collection, structured feedback and benchmarking;Currow;Support Care Cancer,2015

3. Physical symptoms at the time of dying was diagnosed: a consecutive cohort study to describe the prevalence and intensity of problems experienced by imminently dying palliative care patients by diagnosis and place of care;Clark;J Palliat Med,2016

4. Clapham S . Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) clinical manual. Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong. 2014. https://ahsri.uow.edu.au/pcoc/assessment-package/groups/public/@web/@chsd/@pcoc/documents/doc/uow129133.pdf (accessed Feb 2018).

5. Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration. Patient outcomes in palliative care national results for January–June 2017 detailed report. 2017. https://ahsri.uow.edu.au/pcoc/reports/national/index.html (accessed Feb 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3