Abstract
BackgroundHeated tobacco products (HTPs) have received excise tax rates that are lower than combusted cigarettes in most of the countries in which the products are sold as tobacco companies claimed their purported reduced risk products deserved such light touch treatment. This study sought to determine if HTPs are cheaper to use than combusted cigarettes when the cost of purchasing an expensive heating device upfront was considered.Methods and DataProduct price data for tobacco heating devices, as well as cobranded heated tobacco and combusted cigarettes for 2014–2017 for 34 countries was obtained from Euromonitor International.ResultsOnly in 17 of 46 country-year cases with adequate data were HTPs less expensive to use than combusted cigarettes over a year.DiscussionThe tax advantages being given to HTPs may instead of providing a price signal to a consumer looking to switch, be providing a profit signal to tobacco companies to switch over to selling more HTPs and fewer combusted cigarettes. The implications of these dynamics for public health are unclear.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference12 articles.
1. Calantzopoulos A , Camilleri LC . This changes everything: Philip Morris International 2016 Annual Report. 2017. https://bit.ly/2h6seYr (cited 2018 Aug 23).
2. Philip Morris International introduces new heat-not-burn product, IQOS, in South Korea
3. Heat-not-burn tobacco products: concerns from the Italian experience
4. Bansal P , Lasseter T , Wilson D , et al . How Philip Morris is selling regulators on its hot new smoking device. 2017. https://reut.rs/2yHiGiP (cited 2018 Jun 25).
5. Combustible cigarettes cost less to use than e-cigarettes: global evidence and tax policy implications
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献