Analysis of submissions to the EU’s public consultation on tobacco traceability and security features

Author:

Gallagher Allen William AndrewORCID,Evans-Reeves KarenORCID,Joshi Ayush,Hatchard Jenny,Gilmore Anna B

Abstract

BackgroundThe Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products requires all parties to establish a tobacco track and trace (T&T) system. In 2016, the European Commission held a public consultation on T&T implementation where parties were asked to respond online to 22 multiple-choice questions and were given additional opportunities to leave comments. In May 2019, the European Union’s (EU) T&T system became operational. This paper explores tobacco industry influence over and policy positions within the consultation process.MethodsWe identified consultation respondents and investigated any financial links with the tobacco industry and if these were transparent. Respondent’s answers to the consultation’s multiple-choice questions were collated to explore whether industry-linked respondents held the same policy positions as transnational tobacco companies (TTCs). Associations between policy positions and respondent’s financial link status were tested using χ2 and Cranmer’s V tests.FindingsOf the 197 consultation respondents identified, 131 (66.4%) had financial links to the industry; 29 (22.1%) were not transparent about these links. A large number of trade associations responded (87), the majority of which (74/87) had financial links to the industry. There was a clear divide in the policy preferences of respondents with and without a financial link. Collectively, respondents with a financial link supported an industry-operated T&T solution.ConclusionsThere was an extensive lobbying effort by the tobacco industry over the EU’s T&T system, with TTCs’ interests being represented repeatedly through multiple trade associations. The transparency requirements regarding consultation respondents’ affiliations with relevant stakeholders (eg, tobacco manufacturers) should be improved for future consultations.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

Reference37 articles.

1. World Health Organization . World Health Organization Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.Fifth Session. Seoul. 12-17 November 2012. Decision FCTC/CoP 5(1). The Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, 2012.

2. Cigarette smuggling in Europe: who really benefits?

3. WHO FCTC Bialous S . The tobacco industry and the illicit trade in tobacco products, 2014. Available: http://www.who.int/fctc/publications/The-Tobacco-Industry-and-the-Illicit-Trade-in-Tobacco-Products.pdf [Accessed 21 oct 2014].

4. Joossens L , Chaloupka F , Merriman D , et al . Issues in the smuggling of tobacco products. In: Jha P , Chaloupka F , eds. Tobacco control in developing countries. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 2000: 293–406.

5. Smuggling as the "key to a combined market": British American Tobacco in Lebanon

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3