'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012

Published:2014-12-03 Issue:e2 Volume:24 Page:e168-e177
ISSN:0964-4563
Container-title:Tobacco Control
language:en
Short-container-title:Tobacco Control

Author:

Evans-Reeves K. A.,Hatchard J. L.,Gilmore A. B.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health(social science)

Reference136 articles.

1. Philip Morris Limited. Standardised tobacco packaging will harm public health and cost UK taxpayers billions: a response to the Department of Health consultation on standardised packaging of tobacco products. 2012.

2. Japan Tobacco International. Response to the Department of Health's consultation on the standardised packaging of tobacco products. 2012.

3. Imperial Tobacco. Bad for business; bad for consumers; good for criminals: Standardised packaging is unjustified, anti-competitive and anti-business. A response to the UK Department of Health consultation on standardised packaging of tobacco products. 2012.

4. British American Tobacco. UK standardised packaging consultation: Response of British American Tobacco UK Limited. 2012.

5. Sir Cyril Chantler. Standardised packaging of tobacco. Report of the independent review undertaken by Sir Cyril Chantler. April 2014. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/health/10035-TSO-2901853-Chantler-Review-ACCESSIBLE.PDF (accessed 10 May 2014).

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceptions of Illicit Tobacco Sources Following a Proposed Reduction in Tobacco Availability: A Qualitative Analysis of New Zealanders Who Smoke;Nicotine and Tobacco Research;2023-03-04

2. Use of supporting evidence by health and industry organisations in the consultation on e-cigarette regulations in New Zealand;PLOS ONE;2022-09-29

3. The 2018 public consultation on standardized packaging in Singapore: Analysis of policy actors' submissions;Frontiers in Political Science;2022-08-30

4. Understanding the long-term policy influence strategies of the tobacco industry: two contemporary case studies;Tobacco Control;2022-03

5. An evaluation of the evidence submitted to Australian alcohol advertising policy consultations;PLOS ONE;2021-12-10