Impact of China National Tobacco Company’s ‘Premiumization’ Strategy: longitudinal findings from the ITC China Surveys (2006–2015)

Author:

Xu Steve Shaowei,Gravely Shannon,Meng Gang,Elton-Marshall Tara,O’Connor Richard J,Quah Anne C K,Feng Guoze,Jiang Yuan,Hu Grace J,Fong Geoffrey T

Abstract

BackgroundIn 2009, the China National Tobacco Company (CNTC) began their Premiumization Strategy, designed to encourage smokers to trade up to more expensive brands, mainly by promoting the concept that higher class cigarettes are better quality and less harmful. This study is the first evaluation of the strategy’s impact on: (1) prevalence of premium brand cigarettes (PBC), mid-priced brand cigarettes (MBC) and discount brand cigarettes (DBC) over 9 years, from 3 years pre-strategy (2006) to 6 years post-strategy (2015); and (2) changes in reasons for choosing PBCs, MBCs and DBCs.MethodsA representative cohort of adult Chinese smokers (n=9047) in seven cities who participated in five waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) China Survey: pre-implementation (Wave 1 (2006; n=3452), Wave 2 (2007–2008; n=3586)); mid-implementation (Wave 3 (2009; n=4172)); and post-implementation (Wave 4 (2011–2012; n=4070), Wave 5 (2013–2015; n=2775)). Generalised estimating equations were conducted to examine changes in prevalence of PBCs, MBCs and DBCs, and reasons for brand choice from pre-implementation to post-implementation.ResultsFrom pre-implementation to post-implementation, there was an increase in prevalence of PBCs (5.4% to 23.2%, p<0.001) and MBCs (40.0% to 50.4%, p<0.001), and a decrease in DBCs (54.6% to 26.5%, p<0.001). There was an increase in smokers who chose their current brand because they believed it to be less harmful, both for MBC smokers (+13.0%, p=0.001) and PBC smokers (+9.0%, p=0.06). There was an increase for smokers in all brand classes for choosing their current brand because they were ‘higher in quality’ and because of affordable price, but the greatest increase was among PBC smokers (+18.6%, p<0.001 and +34.9%, p<0.001, respectively).ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the rising trend in Chinese smokers’ choice of ‘less harmful’, ‘higher quality’ and ‘affordable’ cigarettes, particularly PBCs, is likely due to CNTC’s aggressive marketing strategies. Strong tobacco control policies that prohibit CNTC’s marketing activities are critical in order to dispel erroneous beliefs that sustain continued smoking in China, where the global tobacco epidemic is exerting its greatest toll.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Roswell Park Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center

Canadian Cancer Society

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention

Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

Reference39 articles.

1. Mao Z , Sung H-yen , Hu T-wei , et al . The demand for cigarettes in China. Hu T-wei , ed. Tobacco control and policy analysis in China: economics and health. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co, 2008.

2. World Health Organization. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS), Fact Sheet China. 2010 http://www.who.int/tobacco/surveillance/en_tfi_china_gats_factsheet_2010.pdf?ua=1 (accessed 10 Jul 2018).

3. Eriksen M , Mackay J , Schluger N , et al . The tobacco atlas. Fifth edition. American Cancer Society, Inc. Atlanta, GA. 2015 http://3pk43x313ggr4cy0lh3tctjh.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/TA5_2015_WEB.pdf (accessed 10 Jul 2018).

4. World Health Organization Western Pacific Region. Tobacco in China. http://www.wpro.who.int/china/mediacentre/factsheets/tobacco/en/ (accessed 10 Jul 2018).

5. Martin A . The Chinese government is getting rich selling cigarettes. 2014 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-12-12/the-chinese-government-is-getting-rich-selling-cigarettes (accessed 10 Jul 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3