Abstract
BackgroundAll data systems used for non-fatal injury surveillance and research have strengths and limitations that influence their utility in understanding non-fatal injury burden. The objective of this paper was to compare characteristics of major data systems that capture non-fatal injuries in the USA.MethodsBy applying specific inclusion criteria (eg, non-fatal and non-occupational) to well-referenced injury data systems, we created a list of commonly used non-fatal injury data systems for this study. Data system characteristics were compiled for 2018: institutional support, years of data available, access, format, sample, sampling method, injury definition/coding, geographical representation, demographic variables, timeliness (lag) and further considerations for analysis.ResultsEighteen data systems ultimately fit the inclusion criteria. Most data systems were supported by a federal institution, produced national estimates and were available starting in 1999 or earlier. Data source and injury case coding varied between the data systems. Redesigns of sampling frameworks and the use of International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification/International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification coding for some data systems can make longitudinal analyses complicated for injury surveillance and research. Few data systems could produce state-level estimates.ConclusionThoughtful consideration of strengths and limitations should be exercised when selecting a data system to answer injury-related research questions. Comparisons between estimates of various data systems should be interpreted with caution, given fundamental system differences in purpose and population capture. This research provides the scientific community with an updated starting point to assist in matching the data system to surveillance and research questions and can improve the efficiency and quality of injury analyses.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference34 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2020. CDC WONDER. Available: https://wonder.cdc.gov/
2. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , 2020. Nonfatal Injury Reports, 2000 - 2019. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/nonfatal.html
3. Average medical cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries by type in the USA;Peterson;Inj Prev,2021
4. Differential ranking of causes of fatal versus non-fatal injuries among US children
5. Trends in fatal and nonfatal injuries among older Americans, 2004-2017;Drew;Am J Prev Med,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献