Abstract
Studies estimate that 84% of the USA and New Zealand’s (NZ) resident populations have timely access (within 60 min) to advanced-level hospital care. Our aim was to assess whether usual residence (ie, home address) is a suitable proxy for location of injury incidence. In this observational study, injury fatalities registered in NZ’s Mortality Collection during 2008–2012 were linked to Coronial files. Estimated access times via emergency medical services were calculated using locations of incident and home. Using incident locations, 73% (n=4445/6104) had timely access to care compared with 77% when using home location. Access calculations using patients’ home locations overestimated timely access, especially for those injured in industrial/construction areas (18%; 95% CI 6% to 29%) and from drowning (14%; 95% CI 7% to 22%). When considering timely access to definitive care, using the location of the injury as the origin provides important information for health system planning.
Funder
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference20 articles.
1. A total emergency medical system for the state of Maryland;Cowley;Md State Med J,1975
2. Access to Trauma Centers in the United States
3. Geographical and population disparities in timely access to prehospital and advanced level emergency care in New Zealand: a cross-sectional study
4. Close to home
5. The use of home location to proxy injury location and implications for regionalized trauma system planning;Myers;J Trauma,2011
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献