Abstract
ObjectivesOur research questions are often chosen based on the existence of suitable data for analysis or prior research in the area. For new interdisciplinary research areas, such as occupational health equity, suitable data might not yet exist. In this manuscript, we describe how we approached a research question in the absence of suitable data using the example of identifying inequities in adequate bathrooms in US workplaces.MethodsWe created a conceptual model that hypothesises causal mechanisms for occupational health inequities, and from this model we identified a series of questions that could be answered using separate data sets to better understand inequities in adequate workplace bathrooms. Breaking up the analysis into multiple steps allowed us to use multiple data sources and analysis methods, which helped compensate for limitations in each data set.ResultsUsing the conceptual model as a guide, we were able to identify some jobs that likely have inadequate bathrooms as well as subpopulations potentially at higher risk for inadequate bathrooms. We also identified specific data gaps by reflecting on the challenges we faced in our multistep analysis. These gaps, which indicated future data collection needs, included difficulty finding data sources for some predictors of inadequate bathrooms that prevented us from fully investigating potential inequities.ConclusionsWe share our conceptual model and our example analysis to motivate researchers to avoid letting availability of data limit the research questions they pursue.
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference41 articles.
1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health . Occupational health equity. 2022. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/programs/ohe/default.html
2. Work as an inclusive part of population health inequities research and prevention;Am J Public Health,2018
3. Oxfam America . No relief: denial of bathroom breaks in the poultry industry. Oxfam America; 2016. Available: https://s3.amazonaws.com/oxfam-us/www/static/media/files/No_Relief.pdf
4. Linder M , Nygaard I . Void Where Prohibited: Rest Breaks and the Right to Urinate on Company Time. ILR Press, 1998.
5. Toileting behaviors and bladder symptoms in women who limit Restroom use at work: a cross-sectional study;J Urol,2019
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献