Author:
McConnell Doug,Mann Darren
Abstract
The 2023 doctors’ strikes in the UK have elicited a familiar moral outcry that such strikes are morally wrong. We consider five arguments that might be thought to show doctors’ strikes are morally impermissible but show that they all fail. The most we can conclude from such arguments is that doctors’ strikes are morally permissible in a narrower range of circumstances than strikes in other sectors.We then outline two independent but compatible justifications for doctors’ strikes, one that appeals to doctors’ interests in fair pay and working conditions and one that appeals to doctors’ duty to protect public health. We also suggest that doctors’ strikes can be supererogatory when they aim to correct a government failing in its own duty to protect public health. Finally, we assess the 2023 UK doctors’ strikes. We conclude that they are justified and there is a case for considering them supererogatory.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference35 articles.
1. Osei P . Author Peter Hitchens condemns the ‘Indefensibly immoral’ striking by doctors and nurses. LBC News 2023. Available: https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/special-shows/cross-question/author-peter-hitchens-condemns-doctors-nurses-strikes/
2. Offline: should doctors strike;Horton;The Lancet,2022
3. A framework for assessing the ethics of doctors' strikes
4. The impact of strike action on patient morbidity: A systematic literature review
5. The effects of doctor strikes on patient outcomes: evidence from the English NHS;Stoye;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2023
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献