Abstract
Programme leaders in graduate medical education (GME) are responsible for the final stage of physician training, guiding the transition from supervised to independent practice. The influence of GME programme leaders extends beyond clinical practice, affecting trainees’ relationship with and attitudes towards the healthcare system, future leadership behaviours, work–life prioritisations and professional identity among others. Given the potential magnitude of GME programme leaders’ impact, both positive and negative, on GME trainees, we reflected on our shared leadership model that developed iteratively as a leadership team. We draw on our experiences to emphasise practical leadership behaviours and provide a summary of our observations, leading to nine recommendations for effective GME programme leadership and associated suggestions for implementation. We divide our recommendations into four leadership recommendations and five management recommendations. Throughout, we highlight the process of developing our shared leadership model, recognising that our process and observations will aid leadership teams in evaluating and, potentially, adapting our recommendations to meet their needs. We anticipate that leaders and leadership teams at every level will find value in our recommendations, even if our intended audience is GME leaders from chief residents to programme directors.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Health Policy,Leadership and Management
Reference22 articles.
1. Rotenstein LS , Sadun R , Jena AB . Why doctors need leadership training. Harvard Business School Cases 2018;1–6.
2. Addressing the Leadership Gap in Medicine
3. Leadership Training in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review
4. Crises reveal the quality of leadership;Bennis;Leader to Leader,2009
5. Brown B . Dare to lead: Brave work. Tough conversations. Whole Hearts 1st ed. New York, NY: Random House, 2018.