ICON 2023: International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus – the core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) using a systematic review and a Delphi study of professional participants and patients

Author:

de Vos Robert-JanORCID,Gravare Silbernagel Karin,Malliaras Peter,Visser Tjerk SleeswijkORCID,Alfredson HakanORCID,Akker-Scheek Inge van denORCID,van Ark Mathijs,Brorsson Annelie,Chimenti RuthORCID,Docking Sean,Eliasson Pernilla,Farnqvist Kenneth,Haleem Zubair,Hanlon Shawn LORCID,Kaux Jean-Francois,Kearney Rebecca Samantha,Kirwan Paul DORCID,Kulig Kornelia,Kumar Bhavesh,Lewis Trevor,Longo Umile Giuseppe,Lui Tun Hing,Maffulli Nicola,Mallows Adrian James,Masci Lorenzo,McGonagle Dennis,Morrissey Dylan,Murphy Myles CalderORCID,Newsham-West Richard,Nilsson-Helander Katarina Maria,Norris Richard,Oliva Francesco,O’Neill Seth,Peers Koen,Rio Ebonie Kendra,Sancho Igor,Scott AlexORCID,Seymore Kayla DORCID,Soh Sze-Ee,Vallance Patrick,Verhaar Jan A N,van der Vlist Arco CORCID,Weir Adam,Zellers Jennifer AnnORCID,Vicenzino BillORCID

Abstract

To develop a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy (COS-AT) for use in clinical trials we performed a five-step process including (1) a systematic review of available outcome measurement instruments, (2) an online survey on truth and feasibility of the available measurement instruments, (3) an assessment of the methodological quality of the selected outcome measurement instruments, (4) an online survey on the outcome measurement instruments as COS and (5) a consensus in-person meeting. Both surveys were completed by healthcare professionals and patients. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology guidelines with a 70% threshold for consensus were followed. We identified 233 different outcome measurement instruments from 307 included studies; 177 were mapped within the International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus core domains. 31 participants (12 patients) completed the first online survey (response rate 94%). 22/177 (12%) outcome measurement instruments were deemed truthful and feasible and their measurement properties were evaluated. 29 participants (12 patients) completed the second online survey (response rate 88%) and three outcome measurement instruments were endorsed: the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire, the single-leg heel rise test and evaluating pain after activity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, 0–10). 12 participants (1 patient) attended the final consensus meeting, and 1 additional outcome measurement instrument was endorsed: evaluating pain during activity/loading using a VAS (0–10). It is recommended that the identified COS-AT will be used in future clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention. This will facilitate comparing outcomes of intervention strategies, data pooling and further progression of knowledge about AT. As COS-AT is implemented, further evidence on measurement properties of included measures and new outcome measurement instruments should lead to its review and refinement.

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3