Are we levelling the playing field? A qualitative case study of the awareness, uptake and relevance of the IOC consensus statements in two countries

Author:

Fortington Lauren VORCID,Badenhorst MareliseORCID,Bolling Caroline,Derman WayneORCID,Emery Carolyn AORCID,Pasanen KatiORCID,Schwellnus MartinORCID,Verhagen EvertORCID,Finch AO Caroline FORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesResearch evidence is commonly compiled into expert-informed consensus guidelines intended to consolidate and distribute sports medicine knowledge. Between 2003 and 2018, 27 International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statements were produced. This study explored the policy and practice impact of the IOC Statements on athlete health and medical team management in two economically and contextually diverse countries.MethodsA qualitative case study design was adopted. Fourteen face-to-face interviews were conducted with purposively selected interviewees, seven participants from Australia (higher economic equality) and seven from South Africa (lower economic equality), representing their national medical commissions (doctors and physiotherapists of Olympic, Paralympic and Youth teams). A framework method was used to analyse interview transcripts and identify key themes.ResultsDifferences across resource settings were found, particularly in the perceived usefulness of the IOC Statements and their accessibility. Both settings were unsure about the purpose of the IOC Statements and their intended audience. However, both valued the existence of evidence-informed guidelines. In the Australian setting, there was less reliance on the resources developed by the IOC, preferring to use locally contextualised documents that are readily available.ConclusionThe IOC Statements are valuable evidence-informed resources that support translation of knowledge into clinical sports medicine practice. However, to be fully effective, they must be perceived as useful and relevant and should reach their target audiences with ready access. This study showed different contexts require different resources, levels of support and dissemination approaches. Future development and dissemination of IOC Statements should consider the perspectives and the diversity of contexts they are intended for.

Funder

International Olympic Committee Medical and Scientific Commission

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Medical and . International olympic committee. 2022. Available: https://olympics.com/ioc/medical-and-scientific-commission [Accessed 6 Sep 2022].

2. Consensus Statements . International olympic committee. 2022. Available: https://olympics.com/ioc/medical-and-scientific-commission/consensus-statements [Accessed 6 Sep 2022].

3. Fortington LV , Handcock R , Derman W , et al . The academic research and impact of the IOC medical statements. Under Review 2022.

4. Savin-Baden M , Major C . Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. 2013.

5. Hodge K , Sharp LA . Chapter 6 case studies. In: Smith and Sparkes Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise. Routledge, 2018.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3