Methods matter: exploring the ‘too much, too soon’ theory, part 1: causal questions in sports injury research

Author:

Nielsen Rasmus OestergaardORCID,Bertelsen Michael LejbachORCID,Møller Merete,Hulme AdamORCID,Mansournia Mohammad AliORCID,Casals Marti,Parner Erik Thorlund

Abstract

BackgroundIt is widely accepted that athletes sustain sports injury if they train ‘too much, too soon’. However, not all athletes are built the same; some can tolerate more training than others. It is for this reason that prescribing the same training programme to all athletes to reduce injury risk is not optimal from a coaching perspective. Rather, athletes require individualised training plans. In acknowledgement of athlete diversity, it is therefore essential to ask the right causal research question in studies examining sports injury aetiology.PurposeIn this first part of a British Journal of Sports Medicine educational series, we present four different causal research questions related to the ‘too much, too soon’ theory and critically discuss their relevance to sports injury prevention.ContentIf it is true that there is no ‘one size fits all’ training programme, then we need to consider by how much training can vary depending on individual athlete characteristics. To provide an evidence-base for subgroup-specific recommendations, a stronger emphasis on the following questions is needed: (1) How much training is ‘too much’ before athletes with different characteristics sustain sports-related injury? and (2) Does the risk of sports injury differ among athletes with a certain characteristic (eg, high experience) compared with athletes with other characteristics (eg, low experience) depending on how much training they perform?ConclusionWe recommend that sports injury researchers aiming to examine the ‘too much, too soon’ theory should carefully consider how they, assisted by coaches, athletes and clinicians, pose their causal research question. In the light of the limitations of population-based prevention that intends to provide all athletes with the same advice, we argue that a stronger emphasis on research questions targeting subgroups of athletes is needed. In doing so, researchers may assist athletes, clinicians and coaches to understand what training advice/programme works best, for whom and under what circumstances.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. PREVENTION, INTERVENTION, AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYSICAL TRAINING IN THE REHABILITATION OF LOWER LIMB INJURIES;Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte;2023

2. EFFECTS OF RUNNING ON SPORTS INJURIES DURING REHABILITATION;Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte;2023

3. NURSING IN SPORTS ANKLE INJURY BASED ON THE FITNESS EXERCISE;Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte;2022-12

4. EFFECT OF MODERATE RUNNING ON SPORTS INJURY REHABILITATION;Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte;2022-12

5. PHYSICAL TRAINING TO PREVENT SPORTS INJURIES IN ATHLETES;Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte;2022-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3