Tobacco, nicotine and counter-marketing promotions using Instagram’s branded content tool

Author:

Laestadius LinneaORCID,Van Hoorn Kelsey,Vassey JuliaORCID,Ozga JennyORCID,Stanton CassandraORCID,Li DongmeiORCID,Han Eileen,Romer Daniel

Abstract

BackgroundThe social media conglomerate, Meta, has a policy prohibiting promotion of tobacco products, vaporisers, electronic cigarettes or other products that simulate smoking via their branded content tools. This study examines if branded Instagram posts comply with these self-regulatory efforts.MethodsWe analysed the presence and content of tobacco/nicotine promotion, as well as counter-marketing, in a sample of 400 branded/paid partnership-labelled Instagram posts with tobacco/nicotine-related terms made between 31 July 2022 and 31 March 2023, gathered from Meta’s CrowdTangle tool and classified by CrowdTangle as being in English.ResultsOf the 217 active branded posts that mentioned or depicted tobacco/nicotine products, most promoted rather than countered the sale of such products (84.3% vs 15.7%, respectively). Posts originating from US Instagram users accounted for 42.6% of promotional content. After the USA, posts from Indonesia (19.1%), Pakistan (9.8%) and India (8.2%) were most frequent. Most posts were fully in English (74.9%). Posts featured hookah (39.4%), electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) accessories (17.5%), ENDS devices and e-liquids (16.9%) and various types of cigars (15.3%). The majority of US posts promoted venues or events where tobacco/nicotine products were featured (71.8%). Almost half of all promotional posts (47.0%) were sponsored by tobacco industry accounts. Posts that encouraged cessation were primarily (47.1%) sponsored by non-government organisations.ConclusionDespite attempts at self-regulation, paid partnership posts promoting tobacco and nicotine products are present on Instagram, especially posts promoting venues and events that feature tobacco and nicotine use. Self-regulation of this content shows limited success, suggesting a need for federal oversight and additional counter-marketing in social media settings.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Center for Tobacco Products

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)

Reference21 articles.

1. Kong G , Laestadius L , Vassey J , et al . Tobacco promotion restriction policies on social media. Tob Control 2022. doi:10.1136/tc-2022-057348

2. Instagram . Branded Content Policies, Available: https://help.instagram.com/1695974997209192 [Accessed 11 Jun 2023].

3. Cavale S . Instagram bans Influencers from promoting Vaping products. Reuters 2019. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-instagram-vaping/instagram-bans-influencers-from-promoting-vaping-products-idUSKBN1YN15B [Accessed 11 Jun 2023].

4. Sponsorship disclosures and perceptions of E-cigarette Instagram posts;Vogel;Tob Regul Sci,2020

5. Influencer Endorsements: how advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media;Weismueller;Australasian Marketing Journal,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3