Abstract
Advanced practice providers (APPs) have become essential to trauma teams in the United States during the last few decades. The optimal utilization of APPs is not yet known and is likely highly variable secondary to many factors. We discuss three aspects of the multidisciplinary approach to caring for trauma patients. First, a review of the literature demonstrates that APPs in trauma improve quality of care, patient throughput, and decrease cost. We then report on models of APP utilization by comparing five trauma centers across the country, concluding that utilization remains highly variable due to several system and provider factors. The final portion of this review highlights current billing and coding practices in integrated teams considering recent changes to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid rules in 2024.
Reference32 articles.
1. Lasinski AM , Shaughnessy A , Claridge JA . Trauma advanced practice provider education: the current state of trauma advanced practice provider postgraduate education in the United States. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2024:e001423. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001423
2. Smith-Kimble C . FNP vs. ACNP + Core Differences 2022, Available: https://nursejournal.org/resources/fnp-vs-acnp [Accessed 16 Jan 2024].
3. APRN Licensure and Practice in Ohio . State of ohio.ohio board of nursing.
4. Adult-Gerontology nurse practitioners: A discussion of scope and expertise;Peacock;The Journal for Nurse Practitioners,2022
5. Heuer A , Hatton A . NAPNAP Position Statement on Age Parameters for Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Practice2018, Available: https://www.jpedhc.org/article/S0891-5245(18)30580-7/pdf
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献