Failure rates of nonoperative management of low-grade splenic injuries with active extravasation: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study
-
Published:2024-03
Issue:1
Volume:9
Page:e001159
-
ISSN:2397-5776
-
Container-title:Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Trauma Surg Acute Care Open
Author:
Spoor Kristen, Cull John DavidORCID, Otaibi Banan W, Hazelton Joshua P, Chipko John, Reynolds JessicaORCID, Fugate Sam, Pederson Claire, Zier Linda B, Jacobson Lewis E, Williams Jamie M, Easterday Thomas S, Byerly SaskyaORCID, Mentzer Caleb, Hawke Edward, Cullinane Daniel C, Ontengco Julianne B, Bugaev NikolayORCID, LeClair Madison, Udekwu PascalORCID, Josephs Cooper, Noorbaksh Matthew, Babowice James, Velopulos Catherine Garrison, Urban Shane, Goldenberg Anna, Ghobrial Gaby, Pickering John M, Quarfordt Steven D, Aunchman Alia F, LaRiccia Aimee K, Spalding Chance, Catalano Richard D, Basham Jordan E, Edmundson Philip M, Nahmias Jeffry, Tay Erika, Norwood Scott H, Meadows Katelyn, Wong Yee, Hardman Claire
Abstract
ObjectivesThere is little evidence guiding the management of grade I–II traumatic splenic injuries with contrast blush (CB). We aimed to analyze the failure rate of nonoperative management (NOM) of grade I–II splenic injuries with CB in hemodynamically stable patients.MethodsA multicenter, retrospective cohort study examining all grade I–II splenic injuries with CB was performed at 21 institutions from January 1, 2014, to October 31, 2019. Patients >18 years old with grade I or II splenic injury due to blunt trauma with CB on CT were included. The primary outcome was the failure of NOM requiring angioembolization/operation. We determined the failure rate of NOM for grade I versus grade II splenic injuries. We then performed bivariate comparisons of patients who failed NOM with those who did not.ResultsA total of 145 patients were included. Median Injury Severity Score was 17. The combined rate of failure for grade I–II injuries was 20.0%. There was no statistical difference in failure of NOM between grade I and II injuries with CB (18.2% vs 21.1%, p>0.05). Patients who failed NOM had an increased median hospital length of stay (p=0.024) and increased need for blood transfusion (p=0.004) and massive transfusion (p=0.030). Five patients (3.4%) died and 96 (66.2%) were discharged home, with no differences between those who failed and those who did not fail NOM (both p>0.05).ConclusionNOM of grade I–II splenic injuries with CB fails in 20% of patients.Level of evidenceIV.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|