1. Euthanasia: a contemporary moral quandary;Reichel, W.; J, Dyck A.;The Lancet,1989
2. for example Capron A M. The right to die: progress and peril;See;Euthanasia review,1987
3. Down the slippery slope: arguing in applied ethics;Lamb, D.,1988
4. In view of the fact that dozens - possibly hundreds have recently produced versions of what I have been calling the Great Argument, an explanation is required of my reasons for choosing Reichel, Dyck and Lamb as targets. Reichel and Dyck are of interest for two reasons. First, they have produced an argument that is more detailed than most. Second, they were prepared to advance a crude slope argument, even though they were aware of literature that should have alerted them to its crudity. In the case of Lamb, the interest lies in the fact that he was sufficiently impressed with the Great Argument to structure an entire book around it
5. See reference (3): 19.