Outcomes of universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies

Author:

Greengross P.1,Hickman M.2,Gill M.1,Dugan B.3,Davies S.C.3

Affiliation:

1. Directorate of Public Health and Health Policy, Brent & Harrow Health Authority

2. Social Science and Medicine Department, Imperial College School of Medicine

3. Brent Sickle Cell & Thalassaemia Centre, Central Middlesex Hospital

Abstract

Objective To evaluate universal antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies. Setting District general hospital serving a London borough with 45% ethnic minorities. Methods Retrospective cohort study of 1444 women referred in 1688 pregnancies and 95 tertiary referrals during 101 pregnancies. Results Unselected women at risk for sickle cell disease booked 2.7 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 5.1) later in gestation than those at risk for β thalassaemia were less likely to attend counselling (83% v93%, relative risk (RR) 0.89; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.94), their partners were less likely to be tested (77% v 95%, RR 0.81; 0.77 to 0.83), and they were less likely to accept prenatal diagnosis (22% v 90%, RR 0.37; 0.24 to 0.57). Over 99% of tertiary referrals attended counselling and had their partners tested. There were no significant differences in acceptance of prenatal diagnosis between those at risk of sickle cell disease and β thalassaemia (55% v 67%). Unselected women at risk of sickle cell disease were significantly less likely to have their partner tested or to accept prenatal diagnosis than tertiary referrals, but not those at risk of β thalassaemia. 80% of β thalassaemia and 16% of SS births were prevented. Conclusions Uptake of prenatal diagnosis among unselected women at risk of β thalassaemia is similar to that reported by tertiary centres. It is considerably lower for sickle cell disease but could increase considerably if screening occurred earlier in gestation. Acceptance of counselling is universally high, suggesting that informed choices are made, and indicating a need to measure these outcomes for cost effectiveness studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3