Preferences for virtual versus in-person mental and physical healthcare in Canada: a descriptive study from a cohort of youth and their parents enriched for severe mental illness

Author:

Mazurka RaeganORCID,Vallis Emily HowesORCID,Chen Lucy,Freeman KathrynORCID,Langley Ross,Ross Briana,Arora SwastiORCID,Kahn Mica,Howard Cynthia,Liu Dara,Cumby Jill,Brennan Maureen L,Hickcox Samuel E,Bagnell Alexa LORCID,Propper Lukas,Pavlova BarbaraORCID,Uher RudolfORCID

Abstract

BackgroundVirtual care may improve access to healthcare and may be well suited to digitally connected youth, but experts caution that privacy and technology barriers could perpetuate access inequities. Success of virtual care will depend on its alignment with patient preferences. However, information on preferences for virtual and in-person healthcare is missing, especially for youth. We sought to quantify preferences for and barriers to virtual versus in-person mental and physical healthcare in youth and their parents, including in vulnerable segments of the population such as families with a parent with severe mental illness (SMI).MethodsParticipants were 219 youth and 326 parents from the Families Overcoming Risks and Building Opportunities for Wellbeing cohort from Canada, of which 61% of youth had at least one parent with SMI. Participants were interviewed about healthcare preferences and access to privacy/technology between October 2021 and December 2022.ResultsOverall, youth reported a preference for in-person mental (66.6%) and physical healthcare (74.7%) versus virtual care or no preference, and to a somewhat lesser degree, so did their parents (48.0% and 53.9%). Half of participants reported privacy/technology barriers to virtual care, with privacy being the most common barrier. Preferences and barriers varied as a function of parent SMI status, socioeconomic status and rural residence.ConclusionsThe majority of youth and parents in this study prefer in-person healthcare, and the preference is stronger in youth and in vulnerable segments of the population. Lack of privacy may be a greater barrier to virtual care than access to technology.

Funder

Sutton Family Fund

Mach-Gaensslen Foundation of Canada

Research Nova Scotia

Canada Research Chairs Programme

Brain & Behaviour Research Foundation

Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Reference17 articles.

1. Canada health Infoway . Canadians’ health care experiences during COVID-19: uptake of virtual care. Canada Health Infoway 2022. Available: https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3828-canadians-health-care-experiences-during-covid-19/view-document?Itemid=0 [Accessed 9 Jan 2023].

2. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future

3. Advancing health equity and access using telemedicine: a geospatial assessment

4. Crawford A , Serhal E . Digital health equity and COVID-19: the innovation curve cannot reinforce the social gradient of health. J Med Internet Res 2020;22:e19361. doi:10.2196/19361

5. Centering Health Equity in Telemedicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3