Family-centred care interventions in neonatal intensive care units: a scoping review of randomised controlled trials providing a menu of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods

Author:

Mariani IlariaORCID,Vuillard Cecilia Laure JulietteORCID,Bua JennyORCID,Girardelli MartinaORCID,Lazzerini MarziaORCID

Abstract

BackgroundBenefits of different types of family-centred care (FCC) interventions in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have been reported. However, a comprehensive review of existing FCC intervention studies was lacking.ObjectiveThis review aimed at synthesising the characteristics of FCC interventions, related outcomes and measurement methods in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in NICU, and providing menus of options to favour implementation and further research.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library up to 31 January 2022. Interventions were mapped according to five categories as defined by a previous Cochrane review. We described outcome types, measurement populations, measurement methods and timelines. Subgroup analyses were also performed.ResultsOut of 6583 studies identified, 146 met eligibility criteria. Overall, 52 (35.6%) RCTs tested more than one category of intervention, with a large variety of combinations, with the most frequent category of intervention being the educational (138 RCTs, 94.5%). We identified a total of 77 different intervention packages, and RCTs comparing the same interventions were lacking. The 146 RCTs reported on 425 different outcomes, classified in 13 major categories with parental mental health (61 RCTs, 41.8% of total RCTs) being the most frequent category in parents, and neurobehavioural/developmental outcomes being the most frequent category in newborns (62 RCTs, 42.5%). For several categories of outcomes almost every RCT used a different measurement method. Educational interventions targeting specifically staff, fathers, siblings and other family members were lacking or poorly described. Only one RCT measured outcomes in health workers, two in siblings and none considered other family members.ConclusionsA large variety of interventions, outcomes and measurement methods were used in FCC studies in NICU. The derived menus of options should be helpful for researchers and policy makers to identify interventions most suitable in each setting and to further standardise research methods.

Funder

Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy

Chiesi Foundation

Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy

Publisher

BMJ

Reference41 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Survive and thrive: transforming care for every small and sick newborn. 2019. Available: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241515887

2. World Health Organization . WHO recommendations for care of the preterm or low-birth-weight infant. 2022. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240058262

3. A global perspective on parental stress in the neonatal intensive care unit: a meta-analytic study;Caporali;J Perinatol,2020

4. An integrative review of maternal distress during neonatal intensive care hospitalization;Staver;Arch Womens Ment Health,2021

5. Scoping Review of the Mental Health of Parents of Infants in the NICU

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3