Evaluation of a health and social care programme to improve outcomes following critical illness: a multicentre study

Author:

Henderson Philip,Quasim Tara,Shaw Martin,MacTavish Pamela,Devine Helen,Daniel Malcolm,Nicolson Fiona,O’Brien Peter,Weir Ashley,Strachan Laura,Senior Lorraine,Lucie Phil,Bollan Lynn,Duffty Jane,Hogg Lucy,Ross Colette,Sim Malcolm,Sundaram Radha,Iwashyna Theodore J,McPeake JoanneORCID

Abstract

RationaleAt present, clinicians aiming to support patients through the challenges after critical care have limited evidence to base interventions.ObjectivesEvaluate a multicentre integrated health and social care intervention for critical care survivors. A process evaluation assessed factors influencing the programme implementation.MethodsThis study evaluated the impact of the Intensive Care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme. We compared patients who attended this programme with a usual care cohort from the same time period across nine hospital sites in Scotland. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measured via the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level instrument, at 12 months post hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included self-efficacy, depression, anxiety and pain.Results137 patients who received the InS:PIRE intervention completed outcome measures at 12 months. In the usual care cohort, 115 patients completed the measures. The two cohorts had similar baseline demographics. After adjustment, there was a significant absolute increase in HRQoL in the intervention cohort in relation to the usual care cohort (0.12, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20,p=0.01). Patients in the InS:PIRE cohort also reported self-efficacy scores that were 7.7% higher (2.32 points higher, 95% CI 0.32 to 4.31,p=0.02), fewer symptoms of depression (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.76, p=0.01) and similar symptoms of anxiety (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.13,p=0.11). There was no significant difference in overall pain experience. Key facilitators for implementation were: integration with inpatient care, organisational engagement, flexibility to service inclusion; key barriers were: funding, staff availability and venue availability.ConclusionsThis multicentre evaluation of a health and social care programme designed for survivors of critical illness appears to show benefit at 12 months following hospital discharge.

Funder

University of Cambridge

Health Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit

2. Society of Critical Care Medicine’s International Consensus Conference on Prediction and Identification of Long-Term Impairments After Critical Illness

3. Pandharipande PP , Girard TD , Jackson JC . Delirium is an independent predictor of long-term cognitive impairment: results from the brain ICU (bringing to light the risk factors and incidence of neuropsychological dysfunction in ICU survivors) study. D16 randomized and observational studies in critical care. American thoracic Society, 2013: A5237–A.

4. Functional Disability 5 Years after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

5. Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: a UK-wide prospective cohort study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3