Abstract
QuestionWe examined the effect of study characteristics, risk of bias and publication bias on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).Study selection and analysisWe conducted a systematic search of double-blinded, placebo-controlled, short-term RCTs with selective serotonergic reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or clomipramine. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis using change in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) as the primary outcome. We performed meta-regression for risk of bias, intervention, sponsor status, number of trial arms, use of placebo run-in, dosing, publication year, age, severity, illness duration and gender distribution. Furthermore, we analysed publication bias using a Bayesian selection model.FindingsWe screened 3729 articles and included 21 studies, with 4102 participants. Meta-analysis showed an effect size of −0.59 (Hedges’ G, 95% CI −0.73 to −0.46), equalling a 4.2-point reduction in the YBOCS compared with placebo. The most recent trial was performed in 2007 and most trials were at risk of bias. We found an indication for publication bias, and subsequent correction for this bias resulted in a depleted effect size. In our meta-regression, we found that high risk of bias was associated with a larger effect size. Clomipramine was more effective than SSRIs, even after correcting for risk of bias. After correction for multiple testing, other selected predictors were non-significant.ConclusionsOur findings reveal superiority of clomipramine over SSRIs, even after adjusting for risk of bias. Effect sizes may be attenuated when considering publication bias and methodological rigour, emphasising the importance of robust studies to guide clinical utility of OCD pharmacotherapy.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023394924.
Reference46 articles.
1. The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
2. Rodriguez CB , Sachs R , Williams M . OCD Clinical Practice Review Task Force Clinical Practice Review for OCD. Anxiety & Depression Association of America2015,
3. Pharmacotherapy of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Evidence-based treatment and beyond
4. Methodological Flaws, Conflicts of Interest, and Scientific Fallacies: Implications for the Evaluation of Antidepressants’ Efficacy and Harm;Hengartner;Front Psychiatry,2017
5. Consistently Modest Antidepressant Effects in Clinical Trials: the Role of Regulatory Requirements;Khan;Psychopharmacol Bull,2021