Increasing the value of digital phenotyping through reducing missingness: a retrospective review and analysis of prior studies

Author:

Currey Danielle,Torous JohnORCID

Abstract

BackgroundDigital phenotyping methods present a scalable tool to realise the potential of personalised medicine. But underlying this potential is the need for digital phenotyping data to represent accurate and precise health measurements.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of population, clinical, research and technological factors on the digital phenotyping data quality as measured by rates of missing digital phenotyping data.MethodsThis study analyses retrospective cohorts of mindLAMP smartphone application digital phenotyping studies run at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between May 2019 and March 2022 involving 1178 participants (studies of college students, people with schizophrenia and people with depression/anxiety). With this large combined data set, we report on the impact of sampling frequency, active engagement with the application, phone type (Android vs Apple), gender and study protocol features on missingness/data quality.FindingsMissingness from sensors in digital phenotyping is related to active user engagement with the application. After 3 days of no engagement, there was a 19% decrease in average data coverage for both Global Positioning System and accelerometer. Data sets with high degrees of missingness can generate incorrect behavioural features that may lead to faulty clinical interpretations.ConclusionsDigital phenotyping data quality requires ongoing technical and protocol efforts to minimise missingness. Adding run-in periods, education with hands-on support and tools to easily monitor data coverage are all productive strategies studies can use today.Clinical implicationsWhile it is feasible to capture digital phenotyping data from diverse populations, clinicians should consider the degree of missingness in the data before using them for clinical decision-making.

Funder

Sydney Baer Jr Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3