Work Engagement and Well-being Study (SWELL): a randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating the effects of mindfulness versus light physical exercise at work
-
Published:2024-01
Issue:1
Volume:27
Page:e300885
-
ISSN:2755-9734
-
Container-title:BMJ Mental Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMJ Ment Health
Author:
Vainre MarisORCID,
Dalgleish Tim,
Watson Peter,
Haag Christina,
Dercon Quentin,
Galante Julieta,
Hitchcock Caitlin
Abstract
BackgroundMindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) are increasingly offered at work, often in online self-guided format. However, the evidence on MBPs’ effect on work performance (WP) is inconsistent.ObjectiveThis pragmatic randomised controlled feasibility trial assessed procedural uncertainties, intervention acceptability and preliminary effect sizes of an MBP on WP, relative to an alternative intervention.Methods241 employees from eight employers were randomised (1:1) to complete a 4-week, self-guided, online MBP or a light physical exercise programme (LE)(active control). Feasibility and acceptability measures were of primary interest. WP at postintervention (PostInt) was the primary outcome for preliminary assessment of effect sizes. Secondary outcomes assessed mental health (MH) and cognitive processes hypothesised to be targeted by the MBP. Outcomes were collected at baseline, PostInt and 12-week follow-up (12wFUP). Prospective trial protocol:NCT04631302.Findings87% of randomised participants started the course. Courses had high acceptability. Retention rates were typical for online trials (64% PostInt; 30% 12wFUP). MBP, compared with the LE control, offered negligible benefits for WP (PostInt (d=0.06, 95% CI −0.19 to 0.32); 12wFUP (d=0.02, 95% CI −0.30 to 0.26)). Both interventions improved MH outcomes (ds=−0.40 to 0.58, 95% CI −0.32 to 0.18); between-group differences were small (ds=−0.09 to 0.04, 95% CI −0.15 to 0.17).ConclusionThe trial is feasible; interventions are acceptable. Results provide little support for a later phase trial comparing an MBP to a light exercise control. To inform future trials, we summarise procedural challenges.Clinical implicationsResults suggest MBPs are unlikely to improve WP relative to light physical exercise. Although the MBP improved MH, other active interventions may be just as efficacious.Trial registration numberNCT04631302.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Estonia’s Education and Youth Board
UK Medical Research Council
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust
Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit at the University of Cambridge
National Institute for Health
Applied Research Collaboration East of England
Australian Research Council
Wellcome
Reference87 articles.
1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Depression in adults: recognition and management (NICE guidance). Report no.: CG90 [National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence]. 2009. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG90 [Accessed 15 Feb 2023].
2. Directorate-General for Employment SA and I (European C) . Health and safety at work is everybody’s business: practical guidance for employers. LU Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/721956 [Accessed 07 Aug 2023].
3. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Mental wellbeing at work (NICE guidance). Report no.: NG212 [NICE]. 2022. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng212 [Accessed 20 Jun 2022].
4. An examination of mindfulness-based programs in US medical schools;Barnes;Mindfulness,2017
5. Chen C . Work pray code: when work becomes religion in Silicon valley. Princeton Princeton University Press; 2022. doi:10.1515/9780691220871