Impact of pharmacist interventions provided in the emergency department on quality use of medicines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Atey Tesfay MehariORCID,Peterson Gregory MORCID,Salahudeen Mohammed SajiORCID,Bereznicki Luke RORCID,Wimmer Barbara CORCID

Abstract

BackgroundPharmacists have an increasing role as part of the emergency department (ED) team. However, the impact of ED-based pharmacy interventions on the quality use of medicines has not been well characterised.ObjectiveThis systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence from studies examining the impact of interventions provided by pharmacists on the quality use of medicines in adults presenting to ED.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and reviewed full texts. Studies that compared the impact of interventions provided by pharmacists with usual care in ED and reported medication-related primary outcomes were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 and Newcastle-Ottawa tools were used to assess the risk of bias. Summary estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, along with sensitivity and sub-group analyses.ResultsThirty-one studies involving 13 242 participants were included. Pharmacists were predominantly involved in comprehensive medication review, advanced pharmacotherapy assessment, staff and patient education, identification of medication discrepancies and drug-related problems, medication prescribing and co-prescribing, and medication preparation and administration. The activities reduced the number of medication errors by a mean of 0.33 per patient (95% CI −0.42 to −0.23, I2=51%) and the proportion of patients with at least one error by 73% (risk ratio (RR)=0.27, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.40, I2=85.3%). The interventions were also associated with more complete and accurate medication histories, increased appropriateness of prescribed medications by 58% (RR=1.58, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.06, I2=95%) and quicker initiation of time-critical medications.ConclusionThe evidence indicates improved quality use of medicines when pharmacists are included in ED care teams.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020165234.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference50 articles.

1. Australian Government Department of Health . Quality use of medicines (QUM), 2020. Available: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/nmp-quality.htm [Accessed 22 Sep 2021].

2. Medication use in the emergency department: Why are we placing patients at risk?

3. Medication safety in the emergency department: a study of serious medication errors reported by 101 hospitals from 2011 to 2020;Kukielka;Patient Safety,2022

4. Emergency medicine pharmacy practice in Australia: a national survey;Roman;J Pharm Pract Res,2019

5. Strategies for reducing medication errors in the emergency department;Weant;Open Access Emerg Med,2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3