Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities

Author:

Cottey LauraORCID,Shanahan Thomas Alexander GerrardORCID,Gronlund Toto,Whiting Caroline,Sokunbi Moses,Carley Simon David,Smith Jason EORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThe priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Much has changed in the last 5 years, not least a global infectious disease pandemic and a significant worsening of the crisis in the urgent and emergency care system. Our aim was to review and refresh the emergency medicine research priorities.MethodsA steering group including patients, carers and healthcare professionals was established to agree to the methodology of the refresh. An independent adviser from the JLA chaired the steering group. The scope was adult patients in the ED. New questions were invited via an open call using multiple communications methods ensuring that patients, carers and healthcare professionals had the opportunity to contribute. Questions underwent minisystematic (BestBETs) review to determine if the question had been answered, and the original 2017 priorities were reviewed. Any questions that remained unanswered were included in an interim prioritisation survey, which was distributed to patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Rankings from this survey were reviewed by the steering group and a shortlist of questions put forward to the final workshop, which was held to discuss and rank the research questions in order of priority.Results77 new questions were submitted, of which 58 underwent mini-systematic review. After this process, 49 questions (of which 32 were new, 11 were related to original priorities and 6 unanswered original priorities were carried forward) were reviewed by the steering group and included in an interim prioritisation survey. The interim prioritisation survey attracted 276 individual responses. 26 questions were shortlisted for discussion at the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were agreed.ConclusionWe have redefined the priorities for emergency medicine research in the UK using robust and established methodology, which will inform the agenda for the coming years.

Funder

Royal College of Emergency Medicine

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. An Emergency Medicine Research Priority Setting Partnership to establish the top 10 research priorities in emergency medicine

2. NIHR . NIHR James LIND alliance priority setting partnerships rolling call. 2022. Available: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-james-lind-alliance-priority-setting-partnerships-rolling-call/28569

3. Corfield A . Early vasopressors in sepsis (EVIS). 2021. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR132594#/summary-of-research

4. Lasserson D . Stopping anticoagulation for isolated or incidental sub-segmental pulmonary embolism (STOPAPE) Natl. Inst. Health Care Res. Funding awards. 2019. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR128073#/

5. Goodacre S . Accuracy, impact and cost-effectiveness of Prehospital clinical early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis. Natl. Inst. Health Care Res. Funding awards. 2019. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/17/136/10#/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3