Emergency department staff views of NHS 111 First: qualitative interview study in England

Author:

MacLellan JenniferORCID,Turnbull Joanne,Prichard Jane,Pope Catherine

Abstract

BackgroundNHS 111 is a phone and online urgent care triage and assessment system that aims to reduce UK ED demand. In 2020, 111 First was introduced to triage patients before entry to the ED and to offer direct booking for patients needing ED or urgent care into same-day arrival time slots. 111 First continues to be used post pandemic, but concerns about patient safety, delays or inequities in accessing care have been voiced. This paper examines ED and urgent care centre (UCC) staff experiences of NHS 111 First.MethodSemistructured telephone interviews were conducted with ED/UCC practitioners across England between October 2020 and July 2021 as part of a larger multimethod study examining the impact of NHS 111 online. We purposively recruited from areas with high need/demand likely to be using NHS 111 services. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded inductively by the primary researcher. We coded all items to capture experiences of 111 First within the full project coding tree and from this constructed two explanatory themes which were refined by the wider research team.ResultsWe recruited 27 participants (10 nurses, 9 doctors and 8 administrator/managers) working in ED/UCCs serving areas with high deprivation and mixed sociodemographic profiles. Participants reported local triage/streaming systems predating 111 First continued to operate so that, despite prebooked arrival slots at the ED, all attendances were funnelled into a single queue. This was described by participants as a source of frustration for staff and patients. Interviewees perceived remote algorithm-based assessments as less robust than in-person assessments which drew on more nuanced clinical expertise.DiscussionWhile remote preassessment of patients before they present at ED is attractive, existing triage and streaming systems based on acuity, and staff views about the superiority of clinical acumen, are likely to remain barriers to the effective use of 111 First as a demand management strategy.

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine,Emergency Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Greenwood-Ericksen MB , Kocher K . Trends in emergency department use by rural and urban populations in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e191919. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919

2. Hayes T . Primer: examining trends in emergency department utilization and costs. American Action Forum; 2018. Available: https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/primer-examining-trends-in-emergency-department-utilization-and-costs/#ixzz7a7zLkldl [Accessed 14 Mar 2023].

3. Why are people increasingly attending the emergency department? A study of the French healthcare system

4. Morley C , Unwin M , Peterson GM , et al . Emergency department crowding: a systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS One 2018;13:e0203316. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203316

5. Nuffield Trust . Quality Watch: A&E Waiting Times. Nuffield Trust Evidence for Better Health care; 2022. Available: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resource/a-e-waiting-times#background [Accessed 14 Mar 2023].

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3