SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer
-
Published:2022-10
Issue:10
Volume:32
Page:1236-1243
-
ISSN:1048-891X
-
Container-title:International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Gynecol Cancer
Author:
Boria FelixORCID, Chiva LuisORCID, Chacon EnriqueORCID, Zanagnolo Vanna, Fagotti AnnaORCID, Kucukmetin Ali, Mom Constantijne, Chakalova, Galina, Shamistan Aliyev, Malzoni Mario, Narducci Fabrice, Arencibia Octavio, Raspagliesi Francesco, Toptas TayfunORCID, Cibula David, Kaidarova Dilyara, Meydanli Mehmet MutluORCID, Tavares Mariana, Golub Dmytro, Perrone Anna MyriamORCID, Poka RobertORCID, Zusterzeel Petra L M, Aluloski Igor, Goffin Frederic, Haidopoulos Dimitrios, Haller Herman, Jach Robert, Yezhova Iryna, Bernardino Margarida, Bharathan Rasiah, Maenpaa Minna M, Sukhin VladyslavORCID, Feron Jean-Guillaume, Fruscio RobertORCID, Kukk Kersti, Ponce Jordi, Demirkiran Fuat, Vorgias George, Povolotskaya Natalia, Coronado Martín Pluvio J, Marina TiermesORCID, Zapardiel IgnacioORCID, Bizzarri NicolòORCID, Gorostidi MikelORCID, Gutierrez Monica, Manzour NabilORCID, Berasaluce Arantxa, Martin-Calvo Nerea
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort.ResultsA total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy.ConclusionsPatients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,Oncology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|