Abstract
Background and objectives
This randomized, controlled, double-blind trial compared the
effectiveness of levobupivacaine delivery of a programmed intermittent
paravertebral bolus with a continuous paravertebral infusion.
Methods
Thirty-two consecutively enrolled patients who underwent unilateral
video-assisted thoracic surgery were randomized to receive either a
programmed intermittent paravertebral bolus of 10 mL of 0.2%
levobupivacaine every 2 hours (Bolus group, n=16) or a continuous
paravertebral infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine at 5 mL/hour (Infusion
group, n=16) after the operation. Postoperatively, after injection of
20 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine through the paravertebral catheter, a
mechanical infusion pump was set depending on the assigned group. The
primary efficacy outcome was the number of anesthetized dermatomes
24 hours after the initial bolus of levobupivacaine. The secondary
efficacy outcomes included the number of anesthetized dermatomes at
other time points, pain at rest and coughing, additional analgesic use
and patient acceptance of the analgesic technique. Arterial
levobupivacaine concentration was measured to ensure safety. P<0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Results
The mean (95% CI) number of anesthetized dermatomes 24 hours after
the initial bolus of levobupivacaine was significantly larger among
subjects receiving programmed intermittent bolus (n=16) compared with
those receiving continuous infusion (n=16; 6.8 (5.7–7.9) vs 3.1
(2.0–4.2); p<0.001). The arterial levobupivacaine concentration did
not reach a toxic level.
Conclusions
The programmed intermittent paravertebral bolus of levobupivacaine
provided a wider dermatomal spread of sensory block than continuous
paravertebral infusion with an identical hourly dose of
levobupivacaine.
Trial registration number
NCT000022532.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献