Abstract
BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the application of deep learning (DL) models for the detection of subdural hematoma (SDH).MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search using relevant keywords. Articles extracted were original studies in which sensitivity and/or specificity were reported. Two different approaches of frequentist and Bayesian inference were applied. For quality and risk of bias assessment we used Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2).ResultsWe analyzed 22 articles that included 1,997,749 patients. In the first step, the frequentist method showed a pooled sensitivity of 88.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 83.9% to 92.4%) and a specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 94.6% to 98.6%). In the second step, using Bayesian methods including 11 studies that reported sensitivity and specificity, a sensitivity rate of 86.8% (95% CI: 77.6% to 92.9%) at a specificity level of 86.9% (95% CI: 60.9% to 97.2%) was achieved. The risk of bias assessment was not remarkable using QUADAS-2.ConclusionDL models might be an appropriate tool for detecting SDHs with a reasonably high sensitivity and specificity.
Subject
Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery
Reference70 articles.
1. He W , Goodkind D , Kowal PR . An aging world: 2015. DC: United States Census Bureau Washington, 2016.
2. Chronic subdural hematoma-incidence, complications, and financial impact;Rauhala;Acta Neurochir,2020
3. Increasing incidence of chronic subdural haematoma in the elderly;Adhiyaman;QJM: An International Journal of Medicine,2017
4. [Epidemiology of chronic subdural hematomas];Karibe;No Shinkei Geka,2011
5. Updates in chronic subdural hematoma: epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, treatment, and outcome;Feghali;World Neurosurg,2020
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献