Technique and impact on first pass effect primary results of the ASSIST global registry

Author:

Gupta RishiORCID,Miralbés Salvador,Calleja Bonilla Angel,Naravetla Bharath,Majjhoo Aniel Q,Rayes Mahmoud,Spiotta Alejandro MORCID,Loehr Christian,Cioltan Andreea,Vollherbst Dominik FORCID,Martínez-Galdámez MarioORCID,Galván-Fernandez Jorge,Khaldi AhmadORCID,McTaggart Ryan A.,Jayaraman Mahesh V,Defreyne Luc,Dhondt Elisabeth,Vega PedroORCID,Murias EduardoORCID,Lin Eugene,Chaubal Varun,Price Lori LynORCID,Liebeskind David S,Möhlenbruch Markus A

Abstract

BackgroundPatients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic strokes from large vessel occlusion (LVO) have better outcomes with effective reperfusion. However, it is unknown which technique leads to better technical and clinical success. We aimed to determine which technique yields the most effective first pass reperfusion during MT.MethodsIn a prospective, multicenter global registry we enrolled patients treated with operator preferred MT technique at 71 hospitals from January 2019 to January 2022. Three techniques were assessed: SR Classic with stent retriever (SR) and balloon guide catheter (BGC); SR Combination which employed SR with contact aspiration with or without BGC; and direct aspiration (DA) with or without BGC. The primary outcome was achieving an expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score of 2c or 3 on the first pass, with the primary technique as adjudicated by core lab. The primary clinical outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2.ResultsA total of 1492 patients were enrolled. Patients treated with SR Classic or SR Combination were more likely to achieve first pass eTICI 2c or 3 reperfusion (P=0.01). There was no significant difference in mRS 0–2 (P=0.46) or safety endpoints.ConclusionsThe use of SR Classic or SR Combination was more likely to achieve first pass eTICI 2c or 3 reperfusion. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes and safety endpoints.

Funder

Stryker Neurovascular

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3