Abstract
BackgroundThis study investigates the efficacy and safety of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before endovascular therapy (EVT) compared with EVT alone in patients with large infarction core.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2015 to June 2024. Included studies involved patients with acute ischemic stroke with an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score of ≤5 or an ischemic core volume of ≥50 mL. Studies were required to provide either 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, reperfusion, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or 90-day mortality.ResultsNine observational studies with 2641 patients were analyzed. The IVT+EVT group had a higher rate of 90-day functional independence (mRS 0–2; OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.87; adjusted OR (aOR) 1.43, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.68) and 90-day functional outcome (mRS 0–3; OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.62; aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37) compared with EVT alone. There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.64; aOR 1.07, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.54) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.02; aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.04) between the two groups. Moreover, patients who received IVT+EVT had a higher rate of sICH (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.64; aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.01).ConclusionsIn patients with large infarction core, bridging IVT before EVT is associated with favorable functional outcomes compared with EVT, even though bridging therapy entails a higher risk of sICH. Further trials are needed to confirm these findings.