Comparison of short term surgical outcomes of male and female gastrointestinal surgeons in Japan: retrospective cohort study

Author:

Okoshi Kae,Endo Hideki,Nomura SachiyoORCID,Kono Emiko,Fujita Yusuke,Yasufuku Itaru,Hida Koya,Yamamoto Hiroyuki,Miyata Hiroaki,Yoshida Kazuhiro,Kakeji Yoshihiro,Kitagawa Yuko

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo compare short term surgical outcomes between male and female gastrointestinal surgeons in Japan.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingData from the Japanese National Clinical Database (includes data on >95% of surgeries performed in Japan) (2013-17) and the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.ParticipantsMale and female surgeons who performed distal gastrectomy, total gastrectomy, and low anterior resection.Main outcome measuresSurgical mortality, surgical mortality combined with postoperative complications, pancreatic fistula (distal gastrectomy/total gastrectomy only), and anastomotic leakage (low anterior resection only). The association of surgeons’ gender with surgery related mortality and surgical complications was examined using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics.ResultsA total of 149 193 distal gastrectomy surgeries (male surgeons: 140 971 (94.5%); female surgeons: 8222 (5.5%)); 63 417 gastrectomy surgeries (male surgeons: 59 915 (94.5%); female surgeons: 3502 (5.5%)); and 81 593 low anterior resection procedures (male surgeons: 77 864 (95.4%);female surgeons: 3729 (4.6%)) were done. On average, female surgeons had fewer post-registration years, operated on patients at higher risk, and did fewer laparoscopic surgeries than male surgeons. No significant difference was found between male and female surgeons in the adjusted risk for surgical mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.29) for distal gastrectomy; 0.83 (0.57 to 1.19) for total gastrectomy; 0.56 (0.30 to 1.05) for low anterior resection), surgical mortality combined with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.03 (0.93 to 1.14) for distal gastrectomy; 0.92 (0.81 to 1.05) for total gastrectomy; 1.02 (0.91 to 1.15) for low anterior resection), pancreatic fistula (adjusted odds ratio 1.16 (0.97 to 1.38) for distal gastrectomy; 1.02 (0.84 to 1.23) for total gastrectomy), and anastomotic leakage (adjusted odds ratio 1.04 (0.92 to 1.18) for low anterior resection).ConclusionThis study found no significant adjusted risk difference in the outcomes of surgeries performed by male versus female gastrointestinal surgeons. Despite disadvantages, female surgeons take on patients at high risk. Greater access to surgical training for female physicians is warranted in Japan.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Engineering

Reference34 articles.

1. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Health care resources: Physicians by age and gender. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=30172#.

2. Canadian Medical Association. Number and percent distribution of physicians by specialty and gender, Canada 2019. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/2019-11/2019-06-spec-sex_0.pdf.

3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Active Physicians by Sex and Specialty, 2019. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/interactive-data/active-physicians-sex-and-specialty-2019.

4. NHS Digital. Analysis of the representation of women across the hospital and community health services workforce. 2018. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/find-data-and-publications/supplementary-information/2018-supplementary-information-files/analysis-of-the-representation-of-women-across-the-hospital-and-community-health-services-workforce.

5. Ministry of Health. Labour and Welfare (Japan). Survey of physicians, dentists, and pharmacists. 2018. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/stat-search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00450026&tstat=000001030962&cycle=7&tclass1=000001109395&tclass2=000001109396&stat_infid=000031653231&tclass3val=0.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3