Abstract
The current, widely established 3R framework for the ethical use of animals in research consists of three guiding principles, that is, Replacement, Reduction and Refinement, all aiming to safeguard the overarching ethical principle of animal welfare. However, animal welfare alone does not suffice to make animal research ethical if the research does not have sufficient scientific value. The scientific value of animal studies strongly decreases if they are not sufficiently robust, if their questions have already been sufficiently addressed or if the results are selectively reported. Against this background, we argue that three guiding principles are missing, that is, Robustness, Registration and Reporting, all of which aim to safeguard and increase the scientific value of animal research. To establish a new 6R framework, we need a multistakeholder discourse to conceptualise the specific requirements of robustness, registration and reporting and to clarify responsibilities, competencies and legislation for auditing 6R compliance.
Reference25 articles.
1. RSPCS, LASA. Guiding principles on good practice for Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Bodies. A report by the RSPCA Research Animals Department and LASA Education, Training and Ethics Section. 2015http://www.lasa.co.uk/PDF/AWERB_Guiding_Principles_2015_final.pdf.
2. Authorization of Animal Experiments Is Based on Confidence Rather than Evidence of Scientific Rigor;Vogt;PLoS Biol,2016
3. Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement;Macleod;PLoS Biol,2015
4. Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy;Sena;PLoS Biol,2010
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献