Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial

Author:

Kuyken WillemORCID,Ball SusanORCID,Crane Catherine,Ganguli Poushali,Jones Benjamin,Montero-Marin JesusORCID,Nuthall Elizabeth,Raja Anam,Taylor Laura,Tudor Kate,Viner Russell MORCID,Allwood Matthew,Aukland Louise,Dunning Darren,Casey TríonaORCID,Dalrymple Nicola,De Wilde Katherine,Farley Eleanor-Rose,Harper Jennifer,Kappelmann Nils,Kempnich Maria,Lord Liz,Medlicott Emma,Palmer Lucy,Petit Ariane,Philips Alice,Pryor-Nitsch Isobel,Radley Lucy,Sonley Anna,Shackleford Jem,Tickell Alice,Blakemore Sarah-Jayne,Team The MYRIAD,Ukoumunne Obioha C,Greenberg Mark T,Ford Tamsin,Dalgleish Tim,Byford SarahORCID,Williams J Mark G

Abstract

BackgroundSystematic reviews suggest school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) shows promise in promoting student mental health.ObjectiveThe My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) Trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SBMT compared with teaching-as-usual (TAU).MethodsMYRIAD was a parallel group, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eighty-five eligible schools consented and were randomised 1:1 to TAU (43 schools, 4232 students) or SBMT (42 schools, 4144 students), stratified by school size, quality, type, deprivation and region. Schools and students (mean (SD); age range=12.2 (0.6); 11–14 years) were broadly UK population-representative. Forty-three schools (n=3678 pupils; 86.9%) delivering SBMT, and 41 schools (n=3572; 86.2%) delivering TAU, provided primary end-point data. SBMT comprised 10 lessons of psychoeducation and mindfulness practices. TAU comprised standard social-emotional teaching. Participant-level risk for depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being at 1 year follow-up were the co-primary outcomes. Secondary and economic outcomes were included.FindingsAnalysis of 84 schools (n=8376 participants) found no evidence that SBMT was superior to TAU at 1 year. Standardised mean differences (intervention minus control) were: 0.005 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.06) for risk for depression; 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.07) for social-emotional-behavioural functioning; and 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07) for well-being. SBMT had a high probability of cost-effectiveness (83%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.ConclusionsFindings do not support the superiority of SBMT over TAU in promoting mental health in adolescence.Clinical implicationsThere is need to ask what works, for whom and how, as well as considering key contextual and implementation factors.Trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN86619085. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT104908/Z/14/Z and WT107496/Z/15/Z).

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference29 articles.

1. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence?

2. Health statistics and information systems: Disease burden [Internet]. World Health Organization, 2011. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_regional/en/index1.html [Accessed 23 Feb 2013].

3. Universal interventions: fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts;Greenberg;J Res Educ Eff,2017

4. Effectiveness of the Mindfulness in Schools Programme: non-randomised controlled feasibility study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3