Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal school-based mindfulness training compared with normal school provision in reducing risk of mental health problems and promoting well-being in adolescence: the MYRIAD cluster randomised controlled trial
-
Published:2022-07-12
Issue:3
Volume:25
Page:99-109
-
ISSN:1362-0347
-
Container-title:Evidence Based Mental Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Evid Based Mental Health
Author:
Kuyken WillemORCID, Ball SusanORCID, Crane Catherine, Ganguli Poushali, Jones Benjamin, Montero-Marin JesusORCID, Nuthall Elizabeth, Raja Anam, Taylor Laura, Tudor Kate, Viner Russell MORCID, Allwood Matthew, Aukland Louise, Dunning Darren, Casey TríonaORCID, Dalrymple Nicola, De Wilde Katherine, Farley Eleanor-Rose, Harper Jennifer, Kappelmann Nils, Kempnich Maria, Lord Liz, Medlicott Emma, Palmer Lucy, Petit Ariane, Philips Alice, Pryor-Nitsch Isobel, Radley Lucy, Sonley Anna, Shackleford Jem, Tickell Alice, Blakemore Sarah-Jayne, Team The MYRIAD, Ukoumunne Obioha C, Greenberg Mark T, Ford Tamsin, Dalgleish Tim, Byford SarahORCID, Williams J Mark G
Abstract
BackgroundSystematic reviews suggest school-based mindfulness training (SBMT) shows promise in promoting student mental health.ObjectiveThe My Resilience in Adolescence (MYRIAD) Trial evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SBMT compared with teaching-as-usual (TAU).MethodsMYRIAD was a parallel group, cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eighty-five eligible schools consented and were randomised 1:1 to TAU (43 schools, 4232 students) or SBMT (42 schools, 4144 students), stratified by school size, quality, type, deprivation and region. Schools and students (mean (SD); age range=12.2 (0.6); 11–14 years) were broadly UK population-representative. Forty-three schools (n=3678 pupils; 86.9%) delivering SBMT, and 41 schools (n=3572; 86.2%) delivering TAU, provided primary end-point data. SBMT comprised 10 lessons of psychoeducation and mindfulness practices. TAU comprised standard social-emotional teaching. Participant-level risk for depression, social-emotional-behavioural functioning and well-being at 1 year follow-up were the co-primary outcomes. Secondary and economic outcomes were included.FindingsAnalysis of 84 schools (n=8376 participants) found no evidence that SBMT was superior to TAU at 1 year. Standardised mean differences (intervention minus control) were: 0.005 (95% CI −0.05 to 0.06) for risk for depression; 0.02 (−0.02 to 0.07) for social-emotional-behavioural functioning; and 0.02 (−0.03 to 0.07) for well-being. SBMT had a high probability of cost-effectiveness (83%) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per quality-adjusted life year. No intervention-related adverse events were observed.ConclusionsFindings do not support the superiority of SBMT over TAU in promoting mental health in adolescence.Clinical implicationsThere is need to ask what works, for whom and how, as well as considering key contextual and implementation factors.Trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN86619085. This research was funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT104908/Z/14/Z and WT107496/Z/15/Z).
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference29 articles.
1. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? 2. Health statistics and information systems: Disease burden [Internet]. World Health Organization, 2011. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates_regional/en/index1.html [Accessed 23 Feb 2013]. 3. Universal interventions: fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts;Greenberg;J Res Educ Eff,2017 4. Effectiveness of the Mindfulness in Schools Programme: non-randomised controlled feasibility study
Cited by
86 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|