Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care: systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence since 2017

Author:

Bowers BenORCID,Antunes Bárbara Costa PereiraORCID,Etkind Simon,Hopkins Sarah AORCID,Winterburn IsaacORCID,Kuhn Isla,Pollock Kristian,Barclay StephenORCID

Abstract

BackgroundThe anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications is recommended practice in controlling distressing symptoms in the last days of life. A 2017 systematic review found practice and guidance was based on inadequate evidence. Since then, there has been considerable additional research, warranting a new review.AimTo review the evidence published since 2017 concerning anticipatory prescribing of injectable medications for adults at the end-of-life in the community, to inform practice and guidance.DesignSystematic review and narrative synthesis.MethodsNine literature databases were searched from May 2017 to March 2022, alongside reference, citation and journal hand-searches. Gough’s Weight of Evidence framework was used to appraise included studies.ResultsTwenty-eight papers were included in the synthesis. Evidence published since 2017 shows that standardised prescribing of four medications for anticipated symptoms is commonplace in the UK; evidence of practices in other countries is limited. There is limited data on how often medications are administered in the community. Prescriptions are ‘accepted’ by family caregivers despite inadequate explanations and they generally appreciate having access to medications. Robust evidence of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of anticipatory prescribing remains absent.ConclusionThe evidence underpinning anticipatory prescribing practice and policy remains based primarily on healthcare professionals’ perceptions that the intervention is reassuring, provides effective, timely symptom relief in the community and prevents crisis hospital admissions. There is still inadequate evidence regarding optimal medications and dose ranges, and the effectiveness of these prescriptions. Patient and family caregiver experiences of anticipatory prescriptions warrant urgent investigation.PROSPERO registrationCRD42016052108

Funder

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration

Wellcome Trust

Health Education England

British Geriatrics Society

The Dunhill Medical Trust

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical Nursing,Oncology (nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference74 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Care of dying adults in the last days of life. 2015. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng31/resources/care-of-dying-adults-in-the-last-days-of-life-pdf-1837387324357

2. Victoria State Goverment . Anticipatory medications: statewide guidance for Victoria. 2022. Available: https://www.safercare.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-03/GUIDANCE_Anticipatory%20medicines%20FINAL.pdf

3. Twycross R , Wilcock A , Howard P . Palliative Care Formulary (PCF6). Padstow, Cornwall: Pharmaceutical Press, 2017.

4. Royal College of General Practice & Marie Curie . The Daffodil standards: self-assessment evidence and guidance. 2019. Available: https://www.rcgp.org.uk/clinical-and-research/resources/a-to-z-clinical-resources/daffodil-standards/the-daffodil-standards.aspx

5. Continuous subcutaneous infusion: is community anticipatory prescribing and administration safe?

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3