1. Frozen section diagnosis;Peters, P.M.;Br Med J,1959
2. The role and limitations of frozen sections and needle aspiration biopsy in breast cancer;Bauermeister, D.E.;Cancer,1980
3. The indications and limitations of deferred diagnoses into those that were potentially frozen section diagnosis: a review of 1269 consecutive frozen avoidable and those that were not. No comparable data about this have been reported in previous series. Although the assessments made are clearly section diagnosis;Ackerman, L.V.; Ramirez, G.A.;Br J Surg,1959
4. Ten thousand consecutive frozen secsubjective, they give some indication of the irreductions: a retrospective study focussing on accuracy and quality ible prevalence of diagnostic errors and deferrals, which appears to be about 2%. The intrinsic nature of the lesions was responsible for the technical and interpretative problems in these unavoidable errors control;Holaday, W.J.; Assor, D.;Am J Clin Pathol,1974
5. Frozen section diagnosis of breast tissue: indicaably dogmatic diagnosis of malignancy. Pitfalls in tions and limitations;Schwan, H.D.;Diagn Gynecol Obstet,1981