Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices

Author:

Chalmers Iain,Oxman Andrew D,Austvoll-Dahlgren Astrid,Ryan-Vig Selena,Pannell Sarah,Sewankambo Nelson,Semakula Daniel,Nsangi Allen,Albarqouni Loai,Glasziou Paul,Mahtani KamalORCID,Nunan DavidORCID,Heneghan Carl,Badenoch Douglas

Abstract

Many claims about the effects of treatments, though well intentioned, are wrong. Indeed, they are sometimes deliberately misleading to serve interests other than the well-being of patients and the public. People need to know how to spot unreliable treatment claims so that they can protect themselves and others from harm. The ability to assess the trustworthiness of treatment claims is often lacking. Acquiring this ability depends on being familiar with, and correctly applying, some key concepts, for example, that’ association is not the same as causation.’ The Informed Health Choices (IHC) Project has identified 36 such concepts and shown that people can be taught to use them in decision making. A randomised trial in Uganda, for example, showed that primary school children with poor reading skills could be taught to apply 12 of the IHC Key Concepts. The list of IHC Key Concepts has proven to be effective in providing a framework for developing and evaluating IHC resources to help children to think critically about treatment claims. The list also provides a framework for retrieving, coding and organising other teaching and learning materials for learners of any age. It should help teachers, researchers, clinicians, and patients to structure critical thinking about the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Goldacre B . Bad science. London: Fourth Estate, 2008.

2. Evidence-based medicine;Guyatt;ACP J Club,1991

3. Sciences AoM. Enhancing the use of scientific evidence to judge the potential benefits and harms of medicines, 2017.

4. Evans I , Thornton H , Chalmers I , et al . Testing treatments: better research for better healthcare. 2nd edition. London, 2011.

5. Nsangi A , Semakula D , Rosenbaum S , et al . Development of the Informed Health Choices resources to teach primary school children to assess claims about treatment effects in four countries. IHC Working Paper 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3