Unusual perceptions at the end of life: limitations to the diagnosis of hallucinations in palliative medicine

Author:

Kellehear Allan

Abstract

The diagnosis of hallucination for unusual perceptions such as deathbed visions, near-death experiences, or visions of the bereaved, is unhelpful in palliative medicine both academically and clinically. This paper reviews the broad prevalence data about unusual perceptions in the general population as background to identifying the more narrow epidemiological source from which the much smaller focus on hallucinations seem to emerge. Major debates and limitations of current hallucination research are reviewed to show that current academic and clinical certainties are largely confined to unusual perceptions that can be readily linked to psychopathology, quite specific organic disease states and psychoactive drug use. Current state-of-the-art in hallucination studies does not warrant broad or uncritical use of this type of diagnosis in end-of-life care. Conclusions from interdisciplinary (as opposed to single discipline) hallucination studies suggest that the way forward for clinical and research work in palliative medicine may lie in a more biographical and cultural approach to unusual perceptions at the end of life.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical,Oncology(nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hospice Patients’ End-of-Life Dreams and Visions: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies;American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®;2023-03-22

2. Distressing Deathbed Visions: Rare, Misunderstood, or Underreported?;American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®;2023-01-23

3. Hallucinations and Hallucinogens: Psychopathology or Wisdom?;Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry;2023-01-12

4. Delirmanagement in der Palliative Care;Praxis;2021-11

5. End-of-life dreams and visions as perceived by palliative care professionals: A qualitative study;Palliative and Supportive Care;2021-10-19

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3