‘Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ (DNACPR)—difficulty in discussions with older medical inpatients and their families: a survey of hospital doctors

Author:

Walker JaneORCID,Burke Katy,Magill Nicholas,van Niekerk Maike,Wanat Marta,Hobbs Harriet,Rocroi Isabelle,Frost Chris,Sharpe Michael

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine, for doctors looking after older medical inpatients: (1) how difficult they find discussions about ‘do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ (DNACPR); (2) whether difficulty is associated with doctors’ personal and professional characteristics; (3) how frequently DNACPR discussions are made more difficult by practical issues and by doctors’ uncertainties.MethodsSurvey of hospital doctors working on the acute medical wards of a UK NHS teaching hospital.Results171/200 (86%) of eligible doctors participated. 165 had experience of DNACPR discussions with older inpatients and/or their families and were included in our analysis. ‘Difficulty’ (defined as finding discussions ‘fairly difficult’ or ‘difficult’) was experienced by 52/165 (32%) for discussions with patients and 60/165 (36%) for discussions with families. Doctors with specific training in DNACPR discussions were less likely to have difficulty in discussions with patients. Older, more experienced doctors were less likely to have difficulty in discussions with families. Lack of time and place, and uncertainty about prognosis were the most frequently reported causes of difficulty.ConclusionsMany doctors have difficulty in DNACPR discussions. Training needs to include managing discussions with families, as well as with patients, and doctors need time and space to deliver this important part of their job.

Funder

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Medical–Surgical,Oncology(nursing),General Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference14 articles.

1. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study

2. The chance of survival and the functional outcome after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older people: a systematic review

3. British Medical Association, Resuscitation Council (UK), Royal College of Nursing . Decisions relating to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. 3rd ed. London: resuscitation Council, 2016.

4. CQC . Protect, respect, connect – decisions about living and dying well during COVID-19, 2021. Available: https://www.cqc.org.uk/publications/themed-work/protect-respect-connect-%E2%80%93-decisions-about-living-dying-well-during-covid-19

5. Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation;Mockford;Resuscitation,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3