Equitable and accessible informed healthcare consent process for people with intellectual disability: a systematic literature review

Author:

Dunn ManjekahORCID,Strnadová Iva,Scully Jackie Leach,Hansen Jennifer,Loblinzk Julie,Sarfaraz Skie,Molnar Chloe,Palmer Elizabeth Emma

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify factors acting as barriers or enablers to the process of healthcare consent for people with intellectual disability and to understand how to make this process equitable and accessible.Data sourcesDatabases: Embase, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL. Additional articles were obtained from an ancestral search and hand-searching three journals.Eligibility criteriaPeer-reviewed original research about the consent process for healthcare interventions, published after 1990, involving adult participants with intellectual disability.Synthesis of resultsInductive thematic analysis was used to identify factors affecting informed consent. The findings were reviewed by co-researchers with intellectual disability to ensure they reflected lived experiences, and an easy read summary was created.ResultsTwenty-three studies were included (1999 to 2020), with a mix of qualitative (n=14), quantitative (n=6) and mixed-methods (n=3) studies. Participant numbers ranged from 9 to 604 people (median 21) and included people with intellectual disability, health professionals, carers and support people, and others working with people with intellectual disability. Six themes were identified: (1) health professionals’ attitudes and lack of education, (2) inadequate accessible health information, (3) involvement of support people, (4) systemic constraints, (5) person-centred informed consent and (6) effective communication between health professionals and patients. Themes were barriers (themes 1, 2 and 4), enablers (themes 5 and 6) or both (theme 3).ConclusionsMultiple reasons contribute to poor consent practices for people with intellectual disability in current health systems. Recommendations include addressing health professionals’ attitudes and lack of education in informed consent with clinician training, the co-production of accessible information resources and further inclusive research into informed consent for people with intellectual disability.PROSPERO registrationCRD42021290548.

Funder

NHMRC

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference84 articles.

1. Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies

2. World Health Organisation . International classification of diseases 11th revision. 2022. Available: https://icd.who.int/en2022

3. Council for Intellectual Disability . About us: Council for intellectual disability. 2023. Available: https://cid.org.au/about-us/ [Accessed 6 Feb 2023].

4. Hatton C , Emerson E . Introduction: health disparities, health inequity, and people with intellectual disabilities. In: International review of research in developmental disabilities: Elsevier. 2015: 1–9.

5. Health inequalities and people with learning disabilities in the UK;Emerson;Tizard Learning Disability Rev,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3