Are more experienced clinicians better able to tolerate uncertainty and manage risks? A vignette study of doctors in three NHS emergency departments in England

Author:

Lawton RebeccaORCID,Robinson Olivia,Harrison Rebecca,Mason Suzanne,Conner Mark,Wilson Brad

Abstract

BackgroundRisk aversion among junior doctors that manifests as greater intervention (ordering of tests, diagnostic procedures and so on) has been proposed as one of the possible causes for increased pressure in emergency departments (EDs). Here we tested the prediction that doctors with more experience would be more tolerant of uncertainty and therefore less risk-averse in decision making.MethodsIn this cross-sectional, vignette-based study, doctors working in three EDs were asked to complete a questionnaire measuring experience (length of service in EDs), reactions to uncertainty (Gerrity et al, 1995) and risk aversion (responses about the appropriateness of patient management decisions).ResultsData from 90 doctors were analysed. Doctors had worked in the ED for between 5 weeks and 21 years. We found a large association between experience and risk aversion so that more experienced clinicians made less risk-averse decisions (r=0.47, p<0.001). We also found a large association between experience and reactions to uncertainty (r=−0.50, p<0.001), with more experienced doctors being much more at ease with uncertainty. Mediation analyses indicated that tolerance of uncertainty partially mediated the relationship between experience and lower risk aversion, explaining about a quarter of the effect.ConclusionWhile we might be tempted to conclude from this research that experience and the ability to tolerate uncertainty lead to positive outcomes for patients (less risk-averse management strategies and higher levels of safety netting), what we are unable to conclude from this design is that these less risk-averse strategies improve patient safety.

Funder

NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centre

NIHR CLAHRC

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy

Reference30 articles.

1. House of Commons Health Committee . Winter pressure in accident and emergency departments. 2016. Available: https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmhealth/277/277.pdf

2. NHS IMAS . Interim management and support. 2017. Available: http://www.nhsimas.nhs.uk/ist/how-to-stabilise-emergency-care-in-england/ [Accessed 15 May 2018].

3. Blunt I , Edwards N , Merry L . What’s behind the A&E crisis. London: Nuffield Trust, 2015.

4. Randomized controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in a suburban accident and emergency department using an informal triage system;Gibney;Br J Gen Pract,1999

5. Morris T , Mason SM , Moulton C . Calculating the proportion of avoidable attendances at UK emergency departments: analysis of the Royal College of Emergency Medicine’s Sentinel Site Survey data. Emergency Medicine Journal 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3