Abstract
ObjectiveCopayment policies aim to reduce the burden of medication expenditure but may affect adherence and generate inequities in access to healthcare. The objective was to evaluate the impact of two copayment measures on initial medication non-adherence (IMNA) in several medication groups and by income level.DesignA population-based study was conducted using real-world evidence.SettingPrimary care in Catalonia (Spain) where two separate copayment measures (fixed copayment and coinsurance) were introduced between 2011 and 2013.ParticipantEvery patient with a new prescription issued between 2011 and 2014 (3 million patients and 10 million prescriptions).OutcomesIMNA was estimated throughout dispensing and invoicing information. Changes in IMNA prevalence after the introduction of copayment policies (immediate level change and trend changes) were estimated through segmented logistic regression. The regression models were stratified by economic status and medication groups.ResultsBefore changes to copayment policies, IMNA prevalence remained stable. The introduction of a fixed copayment was followed by a statistically significant increase in IMNA in poor population, low/middle-income pensioners and low-income non-pensioners (OR from 1.047 to 1.370). In high-income populations, there was a large statistically non-significant increase. IMNA decreased in the low-income population after suspension of the fixed copayment and the introduction of a coinsurance policy that granted this population free access to medications (OR=0.676). Penicillins were least affected while analgesics were affected to the greatest extent. IMNA to medications for chronic conditions increased in low/middle-income pensioners.ConclusionEven nominal charge fixed copayment may generate inequities in access to health services. An anticipation effect and expenses associated with IMNA may have generated short-term costs. A reduction in copayment can protect from non-adherence and have positive, long-term effects. Copayment scenarios could have considerable long-term consequences for health and costs due to increased IMNA in medication for chronic physical conditions.
Funder
Insituto de Salud Carlos III. Spanish Healh Ministry
Sociedad Económica Barcelonesa de Amigos del País
Reference33 articles.
1. OECD. Pharmaceutical spending (indicator), 2017.
2. Ministerio de Hacienda y Función Pública. Gobierno de España. Indicadores sobre Gasto Farmacéutico y Sanitario. http://www.minhap.gob.es/es-ES/CDI/SeguimientoLeyEstabilidad/Paginas/Indicadores-sobre-Gasto-Farmac%C3%A9utico-y-Sanitario.aspx.
3. Copayments for prescription medicines on a public health insurance scheme in Ireland;Sinnott;Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,2016
4. Primary non-adherence to prescribed medication in general practice: lack of influence of moderate increases in patient copayment
5. Is it time to reconsider the role of patient co-payments for pharmaceuticals in Europe?;Drummond;The European Journal of Health Economics,2012
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献