When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice

Published:2017-06-22 Issue:7 Volume:43 Page:446-449
ISSN:0306-6800
Container-title:Journal of Medical Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Med Ethics

Author:

Kitzinger Jenny^ORCID,Kitzinger Celia^ORCID,Cowley Jakki

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference16 articles.

1. Briggs v Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53.

2. Kitzinger C , Kitzinger J . M, Polly and the right to die. 2011 http://www.thehastingscenter.org/m-polly-and-the-right-to-die/ (accessed Jun 2017).

3. A diagnostic illusory? The case of distinguishing between "vegetative" and "minimally conscious" states;Nettleton;Soc Sci Med,2014

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Children, futility and parental disagreement: The importance of ethical reasoning for clinicians in the paediatric intensive care setting;Clinical Ethics;2022-04-28

2. Chapitre 30. États de conscience altérée : soins palliatifs et décisions de fin de vie;Manuel de soins palliatifs;2020-08-12

3. The Briggsian Heresy? Should Previously Expressed Wishes Determine Best Interests in Decisions Relating to Withdrawal of Clinically-Assisted Nutrition and Hydration?;The New Bioethics;2020-05-23

4. Disorders of Consciousness: Ethical Implications in Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management;Philosophy and Medicine;2020

5. Making healthcare decisions in a person’s best interests when they lack capacity: clinical guidance based on a review of evidence;Clinical Rehabilitation;2019-06-06