Abstract
This response welcomes Sheehan et al’s discussion of the criticisms that have been made of mandatory, pre-emptive ethics regulation and their outline of a philosophical rationale for it. However, it is argued that they misrepresent some of the key criticisms and fail to provide any effective response to them.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference11 articles.
1. In defence of governance: ethics review and social research
2. Moralism and research ethics: a Machiavellian perspective;Hammersley;Int J Soc Res Methodol,2011
3. Preface;Coady;J Appl Philos,2005
4. Hammersley M , Traianou A . Ethics in qualitative research: controversies and contexts. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012.
5. Written work: The social functions of Research Ethics Committee letters
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献