Author:
Benson Stuart,Hunter David
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer advertising is banned in Australia, and instead pharmaceutical companies use disease awareness campaigns as a strategy to raise public awareness of conditions for which the company produces a treatment. This practice has been justified by promoting individual autonomy and public health, but it has attracted criticism regarding medicalisation of normal health and ageing, and exaggeration of the severity of the condition in question, imbalanced reporting of risks and benefits, and damaging the patient–clinician relationship. While there are benefits of disease awareness promotion, there is another possible adverse consequence that has not yet been rigorously considered: the possibility of inducing a nocebo response via the campaign. We will discuss the creation of a nocebo response in this context.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference17 articles.
1. Toop LRD , Dowell T , Tilyard M , et al . Direct to consumer advertising of prescription drugs in New Zealand. For health or for profit? Report to the Minister of Health supporting the case for a ban on DTCA. Christchurch: New Zealand Departments of General Practice, Christchurch, Dunedin, Wellington and Auckland Schools of Medicine, 2003.
2. Predicting the Potential for Risky Behavior Among Those "Too Young" to Drink as the Result of Appealing Advertising
3. The role of tobacco-specific media exposure, knowledge, and smoking status on selected attitudes toward tobacco control
4. Television viewing and alcohol advertising with alcohol expectancies among school-aged children in Taiwan;Chen;Drug Alcohol Depend,2016
5. Effects of the Office of National Drug Control Policy’s Marijuana Initiative Campaign on High-Sensation-Seeking Adolescents
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献