Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation

Published:2013-05-22 Issue:7 Volume:39 Page:469-474
ISSN:0306-6800
Container-title:Journal of Medical Ethics
language:en
Short-container-title:J Med Ethics

Author:

Svoboda J Steven

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference76 articles.

1. Landgericht Köln; 7 May 2012;Urteil Ns 169/11.

2. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. Resolution 217A (III). United Nations Document No. A/810 (1948). Adopted 10 Dece 1948.

3. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200 A (XXI). Adopted 16 Dec 1966.

4. Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 44/25. Adopted 20 Nov 1989.

5. United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 39/46. Adopted 10 Dec 1984.

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Neonatal Male Circumcision: Clearly Beneficial for Public Health or an Ethical Dilemma? A Systematic Review;Cureus;2024-02-23

2. A document analysis of the South African national guidelines for medical male circumcision and the implications for infant and child male circumcision decision-making;African Journal of AIDS Research;2023-12

3. African Feminist Perspectives on African Culture;Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies;2023-10-24

4. ‘Male circumcision’ and ‘female genital mutilation’: why parents choose the procedures and the case for gender bias in medical nomenclature;The International Journal of Human Rights;2023-04-20

5. Evidence-based circumcision policy for Australia;Journal of Men's Health;2022-05-30