Abstract
Substituted judgment has increasingly become the accepted standard for rendering decisions for incapacitated adults in the USA. A broad exception exists with regard to patients with diminished capacity secondary to depressive disorders, as such patients’ previous wishes are generally not honoured when seeking to turn down life-preserving care or pursue aid-in-dying. The result is that physicians often force involuntary treatment on patients with poor medical prognoses and/or low quality of life (PMP/LQL) as a result of their depressive symptoms when similarly situated incapacitated patients without such depressive symptoms would have their previous wishes honoured via substituted judgment. This commentary argues for reconsidering this approach and for using a substituted judgment standard for a subset of EMP/LQL patients seeking death.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference19 articles.
1. Medical decision-making in oncology for patients lacking capacity;Marron;Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book,2020
2. v LJ . State of Ohio, 100 Ohio St. 456 (1919); State v. Cage, 218 N.W.2d 582 1974.
3. Kutner L . Due process of euthanasia: the living will, a proposal. Indiana Law Journal 1969;44(4).
4. Bound to treatment: the Ulysses contract;Dresser;Hastings Cent Rep,1984
5. A Comparison of State Advance Directive Documents
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献