Taking it to the bank: the ethical management of individual findings arising in secondary research

Author:

Graham MackenzieORCID,Hallowell Nina,Solberg Berge,Haukkala Ari,Holliday Joanne,Kerasidou Angeliki,Littlejohns Thomas,Ormondroyd Elizabeth,Skolbekken John-Arne,Vornanen Marleena

Abstract

A rapidly growing proportion of health research uses ‘secondary data’: data used for purposes other than those for which it was originally collected. Do researchers using secondary data have an obligation to disclose individual research findings to participants? While the importance of this question has been duly recognised in the context of primary research (ie, where data are collected from participants directly), it remains largely unexamined in the context of research using secondary data. In this paper, we critically examine the arguments for a moral obligation to disclose individual research findings in the context of primary research, to determine if they can be applied to secondary research. We conclude that they cannot. We then propose that the nature of the relationship between researchers and participants is what gives rise to particular moral obligations, including the obligation to disclose individual results. We argue that the relationship between researchers and participants in secondary research does not generate an obligation to disclose. However, we also argue that the biobanks or data archives which collect and provide access to secondary data may have such an obligation, depending on the nature of the relationship they establish with participants.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Innovate UK

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)

Reference50 articles.

1. Information Commissioner’s Office . Guide to the general data protection regulation (GDPR). Available: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/ [Accessed 16 Nov 2020].

2. UK Caldicott Guardian Council . A manual for Caldicott guardians. Available: http://static.ukcgc.uk/docs/AManualForCaldicottGuardians.pdf [Accessed 19 Nov 2020].

3. Congressional Research Service . HIPAA privacy, security, enforcement, and breach notification standards, 2015. Available: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43991 [Accessed 18 Nov 2020].

4. Secondary findings in inherited heart conditions: a genotype-first feasibility study to assess phenotype, behavioural and psychosocial outcomes;Ormondroyd;Eur J Hum Genet,2020

5. Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative;Fernandez;IRB,2003

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3