Abstract
In this response to Neil Manson’s latest intervention in our debate about the best consent model for biobank research we show, contra Manson that the ‘expiry problem’ that affects broad consent models because of changes over time in methods, purposes, types of data used and governance structures is a real and significant problem. We further show that our preferred implementation of meta consent as a national consent platform solves this problem and is not subject to the cost and burden objections that Manson raises.
Subject
Health Policy,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference11 articles.
1. The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution?
2. The biobank consent debate: why ‘meta-consent’ is still the solution!
3. Responsibility for health
4. Informed consent and genetic information;O'Neill;Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci,2001
5. Manson N . Informed consent and referential opacity [Internet]. Reading Onora O’Neill, 2013. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/ [Accessed 31 Jan 2020].
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献